Benevolent: Failing Fast To Fill Gaps in the Safety Net | Beth's Blog

Benevolent: Failing Fast To Fill Gaps in the Safety Net


Note from Beth: I recently met Megan Kashner who is  founder and CEO of Benevolent, a nonprofit with a mission to bring dignity and self-determination to both sides of the giving equation for social service agencies. The Benevolent fundraising platform helps people living in low-income circumstances to make progress toward personal goals of self-sufficiency that may hinge on a one-time need or opportunity—like the example in the video of Stefanie who needs $700 for security deposit for an apartment.

Benevolent makes it simple, transparent and secure for those who can help to step into the stories of those who are striving to reach their goals, sustain their families and clear one-time hurdles.
People tell their own stories and outline their needs. Local nonprofit professionals who know them validate their needs.  Donors can choose a need to support and give what they can to help someone move towards self-sufficiency.

In this guest post, Megan Kashner talks about failing early, placing small bets, and the strategic value of failure in the context of a nonprofit’s start-up year.

What of those we fail when we fail fast?   Guest post by Megan Kashner

There’s a good deal of talk lately about failing fast, failing early, failing big, and leaning forward. In the nonprofit sector, these conversations often come around to questions about whether the donor community is ready to put its capital where its mouth is on supporting risk-taking —  good questions to ask.   In this post, though, I want to look at a question that nonprofits themselves face with difficulty.

It’s about the tricky dynamic between failing fast and failing people. When we’re talking about a social intervention or innovation, most times there are real people with real lives, goals, dreams, and frailties involved. So how, then, to innovate and take risks in the human sector without failing the many real people looking to you for help?  Here’s how Benevolent approached our start-up year with our people and partners top-of-mind.

Benevolent launched online in December of last year. We piloted only in the Chicago area so that we could learn, develop and grow our platform and approach right here in our own community. For those of you who don’t know Benevolent, you can check us out at We’re building a national platform that fills in the gaps in the safety net. We help low-income adults and their families over one-time hurdles along their way to their goals. People identify their own specific needs, and we make it possible for donors to contribute to meet them –  like helping someone get bus passes to attend a computer class; welding gear to take a job as a welder; furniture after a fire; or winter clothing in a pinch. We work in partnership with local nonprofits who know their own clients and constituents well and can work with us to bring these personal stories forward.

Our risk, of course, was that in the early days we could not know precisely what our yet-to-be-sourced donor pool would want to contribute to, which aspects of a “need” profile would be most important, and how much would be too much to try to raise for one person’s need. Had we come out of the gate presenting hundreds of people’s stories and needs, we might have failed hundreds of people, because in the early days, our success rate in fully meeting a need was about 50%. We needed to fail fast, and we did. We learned, changed and pivoted our approaches, and kept moving forward.

To be clear, 50% stinks when you’re talking about people’s lives, goals and hopes. There were four people, for example, whose needs didn’t get met because, as we came to learn, donors are some what “ooged” out (that’s the technical term) by other people’s dental needs.  Here they are: Isabel, Victoria, Maria and Nikki.

There were some whose needs didn’t get met because we allowed them to post for something that cost too much money and turned out to be daunting to our small-dollar donors. Those failures don’t happen today. We’ve learned and corrected.

I’d say that our fast fail has been, on balance, a success. We’re talking about making these mistakes on the needs of five, ten, or fifteen people, not five hundred. Not that failing even one person is okay. We wish we’d known then what we know now. This was deliberate, though, this starting slow, failing fast, and making quick corrections.

Make no mistake, we’re not done failing. We’ll keep shifting and pivoting, learning and forging new paths. You can be sure, though, that we’ll keep the Isabels and Marias in mind as we do and we’ll do everything we can to mitigate the risk to real people.

When you’re working in the human sector, you have to learn as fast as you fail, learn while you’re falling, and stretch out a safe landing when you can. It’s not as easy as the platitudes of “make big bets,” “lean forward,” and “take risks.” These are people’s lives, communities, reputations, and futures — not things we can ever put at risk lightly.

Megan Kashner  is Benevolent’s founder and CEO.   Megan has spent her career leading organizations and programs dedicated to bringing innovation to the nonprofit sector and to improving social service support for women and families living in poverty and at risk. She has served as Executive Director for the Taproot Foundation and earlier for the Infant Welfare Society of Evanston, Chief Development Officer for Chicago’s Deborah’s Place and Program Director for organizations including the Howard Area Community Center, Methodist Youth Services and the Heartland Alliance.

4 Responses

  1. Jill Persin says:

    Nice post, Megan – the idea of failing fast with intention is one we could all apply.

  2. Risk-taking in the non-profit sector means taking chances with real people and real consequences.

  3. This is a great post and something that’s often overlooked with the glam that comes with the social entrepreneurship movement. Everyone’s encouraged to try out the next big social enterprise without nearly as much consideration being given to the costs outside of money, time and resources, that are at stake. Too often low-income communities are treated as social experiments whose problems and solutions are externally defined. I love that your organization gives agency back to individuals!

  4. […] This is the second example (I’m sure there are more) of a platform or app that helps social service workers and agencies crowdsource micro donations for small expenses that may not typically be covered in an agency’s budget but are critical to providing support to clients. The other example, is a platform called “Benevolent” that allows social service agencies to launch small crowdsourced campaigns for clients’ one-time needs – a kick starter for social services. The founder, Megan Kashner, wrote about her platform here. […]