Archive for the ‘Experimentation’ Category

A Twitter follower is worth $0.24

Flickr Photo by Sugarpond

Note from Beth: Last month I had the pleasure of presenting on a panel at Association of California Orchestras with Marc van Bree, an arts and social media blogger I met in 2007.   After Marc finished reading the Networked Nonprofit, he was curious about crowdfunding and free agents, chapters in  our book.  This was also about the same time as the flood in Nashville.   This terrible flood didn’t spare the Nashville Symphony Orchestra (NSO), an event that he first learned about through his social networks. The orchestra’s damages were approximately $42 million and after insurance and support from FEMA, the remaining financial gap could be as much as $10 million.  He wanted to raise some money to  help the local orchestra and test some ideas.   Here is what he learned.

Guest Post by Marc van Bree

The title of this blog post is of course a wildly inaccurate claim. How did I get to the number? In my small-scale “free agent” crowdfunding experiment for the Nashville Symphony Orchestra, I ended up with $235 from 1,000 followers by the deadline. That translates to $0.24 per follower.

The goal was $1,000, or one dollar per follower. It was a fairly arbitrary goal and I had no expectations. However, I’m still slightly disappointed I didn’t make the goal. But consider the following:

Networking

  • All communications were strictly limited to my blog, Twitter and Facebook. Since this was an experiment to test social networking, I did not send an appeal to friends and family in the way people do when they raise funds for a run or walk, or want you to vote for a particular contest.

    Beth Kanter and Allison Fine, the authors of The Networked Nonprofit that inspired this experiment, wrote an Assessment and Reflection Report on America’s Giving Challenge 2009. They found that: “Personal solicitations to pre-existing networks of donors and friends through multiple channels were rated as the most effective methods for fundraising. Thirty-five percent of contest participants rated messaging to friends through Facebook as most effective; 32 percent rated personal email to friends, family and colleagues as effective or most effective; and 25 percent rated email to an existing organizational donor base as effective or most effective.” I did not use any of these methods.

  • In light of that, I personally met only 4 of the 12 donors (excluding myself). Two donors were former colleagues who also have Twitter accounts. However, most of the donors were definitely social media contacts with whom I have had more in-depth conversations. One donor was a friend of a friend.

Sharing

  • Kicking off the effort was paired with an e-mail to a list of about 30 classical music bloggers. In addition, I created Web banners for those bloggers to use. Four bloggers wrote a post; one blogger used the banner. (Other bloggers, not on the initial list, also wrote a post. All are captured here).

    In the Assessment and Reflection Report, the authors bring other good lessons and note that “Some like Atlas Corps recruited 150 ‘Campaign Captains’ before the contest started. Other organizations broke their efforts down into bite-size pieces for their volunteers by creating templates to use to send messages to their friends, post and comment on blogs, and create their own videos.” Perhaps I should have recruited similar “captains” and created more multimedia in a shareable format.

  • I counted most on Twitter followers to spread the word. There were 44 followers that used the #floodofsupport hash tag or linked to the Crowdrise page or blog post.
  • Spreading the word was not a case of “build it and they will come.” The hash tag spread fairly well in the first couple of days, after which it dropped significantly. Even after I created an incentive to use the hash tag (a ¢5 donation for each mention), it did not pick back up.

Technology

  • The donation process needs to be as simple as possible. I would have preferred to go straight to the Nashville Symphony Orchestra’s Web site, but after checking in, I decided it would cost them too much in administrative fees and human resources. Remember, I did know how the donations would start coming in; I anticipated more donations, but smaller amounts.
  • Crowdrise was a good tool, but certainly not perfect: it didn’t allow for $1 donations, as I had wished. The payment process went through Amazon, which created an extra step. In addition, seeing that donations came from different countries, there were questions surrounding paying with credit cards and with foreign currency.

The positives

  • Sure, I did not reach my goal. But I would be willing to bet that the particular donors would not have given a gift if it wasn’t for this effort. Nothing is lost and my “free agent” effort didn’t cannibalize the Nashville Symphony’s efforts.
  • The Nashville Symphony Orchestra fulfills a, albeit large, regional function. But don’t let this geographic boundary limit your campaign. I started this campaign in Chicago, having never been to Nashville, and received donations from different countries and states (England, Germany, and several states within the U.S.).
  • This also tells us something about telling stories and increasing awareness of your issue or organization in general.

The lessons for arts organizations

  • Don’t think of social media as a quick fix to raise funds. This was already obvious before the experiment, perhaps, but even though I felt I had a great cause to support, in the end it was the personal connections and more in-depth relationships that resulted in donations.
  • Beyond using and counting on your social network for donations and spreading the word, find ways to activate your network more concretely: create those “campaign captains.” Going about the effort alone is much tougher.
  • Momentum is tremendously important. Even after a monetary incentive to simply retweet a hash tag, I could not retrieve the momentum. Kanter and Fine identified immersion in the effort and the ability to react on the fly as key aspects in fund raising success.
  • Technology and ease of process is very important. That’s why the Red Cross was so successful with their text message donation campaign during the Haiti crisis. It was easy to explain and simple to execute. Make sure your organization’s Web site and your staff can handle a wave of many small donations, and make it a one-click process.
  • Your key performance indicator is of course the money you raised. But it doesn’t stop there. You will likely have gained more relationships, deeper relationships, behavioral information, and increased the organization’s overall awareness and created opportunities to tell your story. Measure those elements as well.

In the end, this entire experiment was all about just that: experimenting. I wasn’t able to fully engage and immerse myself in the project; life on the outside took over. But remember that the experiment was about creating a low-effort, easy to set up campaign, and seeing where 1,000 Twitter followers would lead. Could I have raised more money? Definitely. But that wasn’t the point.

I am still proud of raising $235 for the Nashville Symphony’s flood recovery effort. It’s a $235 they wouldn’t have had without this little experiment.

Dutch native Marc van Bree is a public relations practitioner with more than 5 years of experience communicating—on and offline—in the nonprofit and cultural environment.

In Case of Emergency, Update Your Facebook Status

In January, after the Haiti Earthquake struck, if you were participating on social networks, you couldn’t help but notice the many, many Tweets and Facebook status messages about the Haiti Earthquake.   The messages included pleas for support or retweeting the news, but beyond that the stream included pleas from people on the ground in Haiti asking for emergency assistance or letting loved ones and friends know they’re okay.

A new American Red Cross survey shows many web users would turn to social media to seek help for themselves or others during emergencies—and they expect first responders to be listening.   The online survey asked 1,058 adults about their use of social media sites in emergency situations. It found that if they needed help and couldn’t reach 9-1-1, one in five would try to contact responders through a digital means such as e-mail, websites or social media. If web users knew of someone else who needed help, 44 percent would ask other people in their social network to contact authorities, 35 percent would post a request for help directly on a response agency’s Facebook page and 28 percent would send a direct Twitter message to responders.  During an emergency, 41% of respondents would use social media to let their love ones know they are safe.

Social media has radically changed how people communicate, including their calls for help. As we have seen in natural disasters from Hurricane Katrina to the Chile Earthquake, people are using social media to reach out for help. And they expect a response from emergency and disaster response organizations.

To meet this growing challenge, the American Red Cross is launching an initiative to address how to reply to these digital cries for help more effectively.  This ranges from online discussion of the issue to hosting an Emergency Social Data Summit – or #crisisdata on Twitter on Thursday August 12, 2010, in Washington, D.C., with government agencies, emergency management professionals, disaster response organizations, tech companies and concerned citizens.

The Summit brings together emergency responders, government officials like the White House’s Macon Phillips, technologists like Robert Scoble and Christopher Penn and civilians like CrisisCommon’s Heather Blanchard to discuss exactly how to address these digital cries for help more effectively.

Disclosure: My company Zoetica and more specifically my co-founders  Geoff Livingston and Kami Huyse have been working with the Red Cross to develop a strategy for this summit for the past two months.    Geoff Livingston has shared a post this morning from a personal perspective about why how social media is impacting emergency response, the compelling reason for the Emergency Data Summit.

As Geoff describes in more detail, the Summit conversation will use established and more experimental social media tools and platforms to involve people who are not in the room in the discussion. This includes a a wiki, Twitter conversations during the conference via the #crisisdata hashtag, Flickr photos and U-Stream (to be provided by NextGenWeb).

On the blogging side, while the main event page is on WordPress, Geoff will be using a posterous blog for updates about the conference and to publish early chapters of #crisisdata white paper. He will, of course, share his insights about the tool for this purpose.

In addition to using Foursquare and Gowalla for conference attendees to check in and leave tips, the conference will also experiment with Whrrl, a geo location crowdsourced storytelling application. Conference attendees will be asked to download and join the Emergency Data Society.  This will facilitate a self-organized, community scrapbook of the event from attendees.  Again, expect a full report from Zoetica about how this worked as a tool as a back channel and documentation tool for the conference.

I won’t be at the event in Washington, DC, but I’ll be participating via #crisisdata on Twitter and exploring Whrrl.   Hope you will too.

How To Make Social Media Experiments Fun!

Arts Council of Silicon Valley Staff

This year my work as Visiting Scholar at the David and Lucile Packard Foundation includes training, coaching, and facilitating peer learning sessions for grantees on using social media effectively, becoming a Networked Nonprofit.    It has been incredible laboratory to put the big ideas in the book in practice.

I’ve had the pleasure working with one of grantees in the Local Program, the Arts Council of Silicon Valley, to coach them in making the transition to being a Networked Nonprofit.     There is a wide range of comfort levels and experience using social media on staff, including the social media gurus who manage the Artsopolis which is focused on marketing the arts in SV.

This is an interesting process of spreading the expertise and way of working to all parts of the organization.   This is a fairly small staff, with limited resources.   As we discussed the challenges of culture shifts, many of the concerns were around lack of time.    The Arts Council’s leader, executive director Bruce Davis, came up a great idea.  “Let’s make the process of experimenting fun – let’s start with a Facebook Friday.”    Their experiment is going to be focused on deepening and improving their Facebook presence for the Arts Council and getting  everyone on staff to participate.   Stay tuned for more …

Sharing Some Facebook Friday Insights

I like to have fun experimenting and that’s just what I’m doing on my Facebook Page, a place for learning, and sharing insights about best practices in social media for networked nonprofits.     I learn so much from the conversation threads and people sharing what they do.  I’ve been remiss in summarizing some of the nuggets out here on the blog, so here goes.

Facebook Strategic Objectives

I asked folks on Facebook:  “What is your organization trying to accomplish on Facebook with its Fan Page?“   Here’s a few answers:

  • To disseminate short stories that are unique to the fan page, as well as to link to articles on our websites. We are much more successful when the stories come with a blurb than when they are simply automated RSS-feeds.
  • To keep up with our friends, to empower them to tell their stories to the world, to find out what they need from us, to introduce them to each other, to offer mission-related action items, and to have fun.

Techniques for More Engagement

Someone said to me during a workshop a few weeks back – it really sucks to log into Facebook and see a two-star post quality ranking.    This prompted me to post a question on my wall:  How many of you Facebook Page admins notice your post quality ranking every time you visit? What I learned is that “drive by” analysis of metrics is really a waste of time.  You need to grab the month’s worth of measures and look at them against your content.

Some folks have been puzzled by the Post Quality score which  is determined by the percentage of your fans that engage when you post content to your Page. (It is calculated on a rolling seven-day basis… See More. The number of stars depends on how your Post Quality compares to similar Pages (for example, Pages that have a similar number of fans.)

Holly Ross simply ignores it and track the number of comments and likes on individual posts.   Jon Dunn does something similar:  “I prefer to really try to key in to what days were successful in terms of content. Understand why we had more new fans on a certain day. What about a certain post created that big conversation. Rinse and repeat.”

That particular wall post had 31 comments and 15 likes, way higher than other types of posts.  Even better than the numbers was the knowledge nuggets shared.  And, ah, I found the secret sauce:   Simply Asking Questions That Allow People To Share Their Knowledge and Ideas sparks engagement!

Is there an App for that?

I have been wanting to test a poll app to see if having close-ended questions or running a poll might encourage engagement.   So I installed this app and set up a poll “Do you think polls increase engagement?  Yes or No?”   Of the 43 people who took the poll, 89% said yes.   Those who didn’t participate in the poll at all, but did on my wall asking for their feedback on polling apps said they didn’t like that the app asked for their personal information.

So, sometimes, the simple approaches work better.

A Couple of Useful Tools To Streamline Workflow

I asked an open-ended question “What are your Facebook administrator best practices?“  This produced a rich conversation on techniques.    This was the first time I noticed people posting on the wall taking to one another, not me.    The thread also includes some great nuggets about streamlining the content strategy as well as streamlining interactions with fans.

  • NutShell Mail is an software that aggregates comments and likes on your fan page and delivers it in one email.   Manny Hernandez shared this link to a post about it.
  • Spredfast is a listening/content distribution tool.  One feature that I like is that it will give you a list of the names of fans and how much a like/comment.
  • There is a way to link google analytics to FB insights.

A Couple of Good Facebook Links

I share about 2-3 really juicy how to links about Facebook a week.  Here’s a couple that got the most likes or comments over the past month or so:

How To Contact Facebook for Help: Directory of Help Forms

Ten Cool Status Update Tricks

Be Careful Not To Violate Facebook Promotional Guidelines With Contests

Four Proven Steps to Facebook Page Success

Top Six Social Media Mistakes and How To Fix Them

Creating a Custom Landing Tab

Facebook Book For Your Desk

Finally, Mari Smith has co-authored a book, “Facebook Marketing: An Hour A Day” – if you want one book about Facebook best practices that combines tactical and strategic – this is it!

Approach Social Media Like Thomas Edison

One of the big themes in our book, The Networked Nonprofit, is the importance of experiments and not to frame them as success or failure but as learning.   Please join me on June 21st from 1-2 PM PST for the virtual launch of The Networked Nonprofit where Allison Fine and I will talk about social media experimentation and other themes from the book.

Thomas Alva Edison held 1,093 patents for different inventions.  Many of them, like the lightbulb, the phonograph, and the motion picture camera, were brilliant creations that have a huge influence on our everyday life. However, not everything he created was a success; he also had many failures.  He also did not find the successful inventions with his first experiment.  In his question to create the storage battery, he conducted 10,000 experiments before arriving at a method that worked.

You have to be like Thomas Edison in approaching social media and experiment.  It isn’t whether your experiment is an immediate success, it is more about what you learn about what works and what doesn’t.   If you want to be successful using social media, you have to take this approach.   The problem I see all too often is that many nonprofits expect immediate success and at the first “failure” they quit.   So, I designed a training curriculum that embraces thoughtful do-it-yourself social media experiments and a process for learning from them.

On Friday, I facilitated the final face-to-face workshop for the Social Media Lab for 25 arts organizations inspired by Thomas Edison’s approach.  It was sponsored by the Hewlett Foundation,  Wallace Foundation, San Francisco Foundation, Grants for the Arts, and the Koret Foundation.   The whole idea got started a year ago when James Leventhal who is Deputy Director for the Contemporary Jewish Museum asked me if I would design some trainings for the  local arts community.

James assembled a group of  funders and the talented Clay Lord from Theatre Bay Area, a local arts service organization to help implement project.  And, then they asked me to design something …   I agreed as long as we all went into it with the mantra – it’s an experiment, not every social media experiment (and capacity building program for that matter) is a success for all participants – some might bomb.    They agreed.

The inspiration was part The Lab Theater a place where you try out contemporary or experimental works before you bring them to the main stage and part peer learning program.

The design for Social Media Peer Group Learning

The content for the first face-to-face sessions was based on the workshops I’ve been leading for the past five years and includes the Social Media Game, Strategy Principles, Experimentation, and the practical and tactical.   After the first session, participants had to design a small, low risk experiment.  But more importantly, they had to get their hands dirty with social media.   I provided participants with templates, checklists, and tip sheets to pick and implement an experiment during the 8 weeks between sessions.  We also had regular conference calls where we discussed progress and offered support.

Not everyone’s experiment showed breath taking results in the beginning, middle,  and even towards the end of the two months.  Some participants got frustrated along the way, but part of the learning was to make time and space for reflection to get to deeper insights and improve practice.   And, with the regular conference calls we started to see a transformation.  From skepticism and feeling overwhelmed, to deeper learning about what works with their social media strategies.  And lots of peer support and connections.   My role changed from the “expert” to guide on the side.

Program funders watching the presentations

Participants Are The Content

The final session was a culmination of learning from experiments.   The framing offered by the funders who welcomed everyone was  “It doesn’t matter whether your experiment was as huge success or bombed.  What’s important is learning.”    There was a visible, collective sigh of relief in the room (including one from me.)

To prepare for this session,  I provided templates and checklists for each participant to make a five-minute, rapid presentation.   Participants had to answer these questions:

-What were the objectives, audience, and how did integrate with your marketing or audience development plan?
-What were some tactics that you tried?
-What were the results?
­-If you could do this experiment all over again, what would you do differently?
-What was your big ah ha or insight that you’ll use in your next social media strategy?

In a couple of presentations, we heard some insights about participants being “fortress fighters” from within.  As one participant  said during her presentation,  “The rest of the staff at our organization is like our audience in some ways.  They don’t like the Internet, they don’t even like electricity.    We’re doing social media because we’re facile with it, but it takes patience to introduce to the rest our staff and have it become a part of our culture.” This opened up a great peer discussion, completed with great advice, and peer support.

In our book, The Networked Nonprofit, we feel that charities need to thoroughly embrace social media (and the new leadership behavior their use requires).   But this is happening.  If nonprofit wait too long, I suspect these organizations will not thrive and some may not survive in the decade.  Change needs to happen now or organizations risk playing a game of catch up.

SF Gay Men's Chorus Teddy Witherington and Jim Nickerson share their learnings from their expeirment

The SF Gay Men’s Chorus shared their journey from skepticism about social media, to dipping in their toes into listening (and finding it overwhelming), and to getting past that to finding a lot of value.

Some of the presentations focused on the tactics.  Here I saw a deepening of understanding and practice.   Opera San Jose gave a presentation on its #operaplot hashtag contest where participants has to tweet the plots of operas in 140 characters. They discovered a group of influencers won Twitter who were passionate fans of the company and have since enlisted them to spread the word.

The Contemporary Jewish Museum shared some learnings from their listening experiment which has helped them connect and cross promote the work of other art museums and Jewish organizations in the Bay Area.

The Joe Goode Dance Company spoke about the challenges of getting an artistic director to Tweet. One of the things they discovered is that their audience wants to hear from the artists. But not all the artists are comfortable on Twitter.  So they used the technique of  “OH” or overheard.  The participants in the room offered lots and lots tips and advice on how to overcome this problem.

Self-Select Delivery Style

Participants were given an option of how they wanted to deliver the presenters, either as full group “ignite” style presentation or in small groups using the “speed geek” style.   This enabled participants to select a delivery method that was most comfortable to them.  It also allowed for a lot of cross pollination of ideas and insight generation.  Participants were very creative in their presentations, not surprising given this was a group of arts people.    For example, the Bay Area Children’s Theatre gave their report in the style of a children’s story.

Posters

Posters: Wall of Reflection and Gratitude

Finally, each organization created a poster about what they learned.   Everyone was given a piece of flip chart paper and magic markers when they arrived at the workshop.  I gave then ten minutes to create a poster with their organization’s name and bullet points of key learnings.   One of the organizations, AXIS Dance, decided to go all out and created the above poster.    I asked why, “We’re tactile learners and I want to share this at our next board meeting.”

Poster sessions are an idea I ripped off from my son’s fourth grade science fair.  It’s another way to share people’s learnings.   I extended this by asking folks to leave messages of “gratitude” in the form of post it notes.  This helped encourage reflection.   We also gave out prizes for the posters with the most post-it notes.    Participants left with their posters in hand, with one participant saying, “I’m bringing this to our next board meeting to talk about about social media effort.”

A Few AH HA’s

  • Social media takes time and effort, but doesn’t have to take all of our time.  We can be efficient, but need to be as strategic as possible.
  • Need to involve staff, board, and artistic directors in the social media strategy that it isn’t overwhelming for them.
  • Social media, at least in the early stages of experimentation, can power audience development and understanding of the art form.
  • Social media is a great way to connect with peers, learn from them, and work together in promoting our work.

Conclusion

Trainings that involved “action learning” together can be a powerful way to build social media capacity.   Being effective with social media strategy requires approaches it like Thomas Edison – as an experiment.   Many times, nonprofits avoid an experimental approach because of being afraid to fail, not celebrating the learning and insights that can result.     How do you create a culture that values social media experiments and learning to get at tangible results?