Archive for the ‘Philanthropy’ Category

In Search of Bachelors and Philanthropy in Rural Alaska and Video Story Capture Tips

The Story

Last week,  my adventure in Alaska started with a meeting with representatives from community foundations around the state of Alaska hosted by the Alaska Community Foundation.   That’s where I met Joe Page from the Jessica Stevens Foundation who told me the amazing story about the Talkeetna Bachelor Society.

The Talkeetna Bachelor Society is a program of the Denali Arts Council, a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation. The Society’s fundraising activities benefit the Talkeetna Bachelor Society’s Fund for Women and Children in Crisis.  The main fundraising event is the Bachelor Auction, where ladies in attendance may purchase, at fair market value, a feisty bachelor to accompany them at the Bachelor Ball.   Anyone can purchase the “male order catalog” and the proceeds go to support the charity.

Quite a different charity auction ….

I couldn’t help but think – what if Joe Page or other community foundation board members had flip cameras, some video and story telling training and shared their stories on the Alaska Community Foundation Facebook page?

I was lucky enough to talk my host into driving me to Talkeetna so I could document this fabulous story.   So  I got into the car with Aliza Sherman who lives in Alaska who I’ve known since 1995 and with Cassandra Stalzer my host to take a drive up the highway to create this five minute documentary,  “The Hunt for a Talkeetna Bachelor

After a few hours on the road, we ended up in the middle of this rural town that was the prototype for Northern Exposure.  We found our way to the local brew pub – Twister Creek and Denali Brewery at the foot of Denali.    Joe Page met us in town and we reviewed the Bachelor male order catalog looking for a good subject to interview.   After walking around town, we discovered that one of the bachelors, Todd Basilone, owner of Mountain High Pizza Pie, was at work.   So,  I did an ambush interview to ask him to share why community giving is important.    I hope you’ll take the five minutes to watch the clip.

Some Tips

I love capturing and sharing authentic stories with video – either with my iPhone (email to YouTube) or the Flip Camera.  No matter the technology,  the process of capturing and sharing a good story quickly is the same.  Here’s some thoughts:

From Nancy Duarte's new book, resonate

Don’t take a vacuum cleaner approach

With video, don’t try to capture everything.   I use a technique I learned from Jay Dedman called “Moment Capture” where you get the most enlightening snippet.    I usually reserve video capture for a special story or moment that absolutely can’t be told with text.  Sometimes this occurs as a video quote from someone who said something that was an Ah Ha moment for me or else it tracking down a story.

If the latter, I have a storyboard in my head and edit as I go.   What I have found extremely useful is Nancy Duarte’s new book, resonate: present visual stories that transform audiences.  While it is intended for storytelling with powerpoint,  I think the frameworks and templates she offers for narrative arcs are very valuable.  It is so helpful to have these templates as you capture the story.

Photo by Aliza Sherman

The Technical Stuff

There are only four things you need to remember while shooting your story.  I learned these back in 2006 from Robert Scoble.

1.  Don’t frame your subject’s eyes in the middle of the frame, use the rule of thirds
2.  Don’t shoot when you have backlight, your subject will be dark
3.  Avoid ambient noise, find a quiet spot to shoot
4.  Shoot close to your subject so the audio doesn’t suck especially when using a camera with built-in mic

My colleague, Nick Booth, from the UK taught me a few tricks about doing on-camera interviews and capturing b-roll.  But to be honest,  I didn’t put those in practice until I had mastered Scoble’s tips with one-take video takes.   That was four years ago when I was shooting video with my inexpensive digital camera and using the free program in Windows, MovieMaker to create videos.   It’s much easier now with smart phones and the flip cameras.

Sharing the Story

Storytelling with social media, of course, is more than you and your subject with a camera.  Social media is a great way to involve the audience in the story as it unfolds.    Mark Horvath is a genius at doing this with his Invisible People TV site.    There are many tools you can use to share the story as it unfolds in video and photo as Aliza Sherman has documented here.

What has been your experience telling stories with social media?  What are your favorite sources, tips, and stories?

America’s Giving Challenge 2009 Assessment and Reflection Paper

Allison Fine and I, along with my Zoetica colleague Geoff Livingston have completed the  assessment and reflection paper for 2009 America’s Giving Challenge for the Case Foundation.   This is Case Foundation’s second online competition that encouraged people to leverage their social networks to raise money and awareness and recruit supporters for the causes they care about most.  Allison Fine and I wrote the reflection paper for the first challenge.

This year we took a more intercative approach to sharing the findings and learnings.  It was done through a series of blog posts called AGC Conversational Case Studies and encouraged the public to weigh in via comments to the blog posts, live CaseSoup video discussions, and Twitter.   You find the report, blog posts, and archived videos over at the Case Foundation site here.

We look forward to more  lively discussions and sharing of ideas about online contests.

Microsoft’s Networked Approach To Accelerating Social Change Through Technology

Ed Granger-Happ, Nethope; Claire Bonilla, Disaster Response Microsoft; Daniel Ben-Horin, TechSoup Global, Vida Durant, CARE USA

Earlier this month, I had an opportunity to attend Microsoft’s  “Accelerator Summit,” a day of conversation with Microsoft employees, partners, academics,  journalists, and bloggers about their corporate citizenship program.    Their strategy focuses on technology and partnerships that can accelerate systemic on the ground social change and economic issues.

The Accelerator Summit included interactive sessions show casing their programs in these areas:  workforce development, employee giving, environment, online safety, and the role of technology in the non-profit community.   While I was very familiar with impressive partnership between Microsoft and TechSoup Global,  I had no idea of the overall scale of their Corporate Citizenship program which was  ranked 14 on a list of the 100 best corporate citizens by Corporate Responsibility magazine, which evaluated performance on a range of issues such as environment, climate change, employee relations, human rights and philanthropy.

Chatting with David Connor, we both had the same reaction – who knew?  Here’s a few gems from outside of my sweet spot of nonprofit technology:

  • PhotoDNA is an team effort between Microsoft researchers and Dartmouth College computer science professor Hany Farid to create a way to identify and remove images of child pornography from search engines, based on matching their digital fingerprints provided by law enforcement agencies.
  • Microsoft researchers are collaborating with the academic community on environmental problems, such as aggregation and visualization of complex scientific data from many sources.  Take for example  deploying 200 sensors throughout the Brazilian rainforest to measure and visualize the effects of climate change.  Or the Web site Microsoft Hohm that lets  people calculate their energy footprint and get tips on conservation.
  • Elevate America a workforce development program,  that provides one million vouchers for Microsoft e-learning courses and select certification exams at no cost to recipients.   The program works in partnership with states across the country.

"Our philanthropy has to ignite action. Can't solve the world's problems with our money alone. We need leverage points." - Steve Ballmer, CEO, Microsoft

Leveraging Networks with Partnerships

After lunch,  Steve Ballmer, Microsoft’s CEO gave his perspective on the company’s philanthropy and corporate citizen activities and answered questions.   One theme he touched on that resonated throughout the day is how Microsoft is working with networks and partners to leverage it’s financial, technical, and social change commitment.  In a follow up blog post by Pamela Passman, Senior Vice President of Global Affairs,  who was our host for the event, she amplifies this point.  “Our citizenship work is grounded in the power of our people, our products and our partners to address social and economic opportunity.  This enables us to have impact, scale and sustainability. “

Akhtar Badshah, Senior Director, Global Community Affairs at Microsoft, facilitated a  discussion on the transformative role of technology in enabling NGOs.    The panel included two winners of the NTC/NTEN Life Time Achievement Award – NetHope’s  Ed Granger-Happ and TechSoup Global’s Daniel Ben-Horin.    Microsoft’s technology capacity work in the nonprofit technology sector includes partnerships with Tech Soup GlobalNetHope in disaster relief as well as others.  Microsoft has heavily invested in networks and there are probably a lot of wisdom about network effectiveness there.

Ed Granger-Happ shows off his office server in a carry on bag that disaster relief workers can use to set up IT support in the field

Even though I have worked closely with several TechSoup Global partners (I keynoted a conference  for their partner in Australia and taught workshops for their partner in India),  I learned some new insights:

  • It’s not about the software or providing access to the tools.    TechSoup works with 32 partners throughout the world to provide Microsoft products at a discount.  But as Daniel Ben-Horin said,  “Our theory of change states that software products are necessary, but not sufficient for empowerment of social change organizations.   We embed the product donation with a connection to the community and capacity building.”
  • Through its network of 32 partners (and growing), they have been able to reach and work with over 100,000 nonprofits on every continent of the world.

Ed Granger-Happ and Claire Bonilla, Senior Director of Disaster Response at Microsoft, talked about their efforts in building IT infrastructure and data sharing in Haiti after the initial relief efforts and how they are building in a “Layer of resiliency”      As Granger-Happ said,  ““The question is how do we turn the people NGOs work with from the group being serviced to serving?”  The shift is from victims to survivors to sustaining entrepreneurs.

Ben Horin noted that TechSoup Global did not have a partner in Haiti, but they did in Chile.  When the earthquake struck earlier this year,  their partner, quickly put together a mobile telecentre equipped with servers, Internet, and software.  Horin also said that other partners in the TechSoup Global network responded to requests for donations and assistance.

Microsoft’s Social Entrepreneurs:  A New Approach To Employees Making A Difference

Lisa Brummel, SVP, Human Resources, Microsoft; Tom Moran, United Way Loaned Executive; Rajesh Munshi; Xiang Li, Givology; Adnan Mahmud, Jolkona Foundation

Microsoft has predictable  strategies for encouraging employees to give back.  They encourage volunteerism by giving a cash donation of $17/hr to the  nonprofit for every hour they volunteer and of course, matching donations up to $12,000 per employee.   They also have an executive loan program where an employee can do a longer stint of volunteering for a local nonprofit as Tom Moran, Director of Customer and Partner Experience for Microsoft did for the United Way King County.

Former Microsoft employees  have founded and supported more than 150 non-profit organizations and social ventures working around the world, according to its alumni foundation. One of the most inspiring stories is from John Wood, founder of Room-to-Read, who left Microsoft in 1998 to change the world.   These days, Microsoft employees don’t have to leave the company to launch and scale social ventures.

Younger, GEN Y employees like Adnan Mahmud, founder of Jolkona Foundation, a micro giving site for projects in developing countries, and Xiang Li,  founder of Givology, a site that facilitates micro loans for education in developing countries are two examples.   Both had a personal experience, an  encounter with extreme poverty – that touched their hearts and motivated them to do something.  Microsoft has the culture and resources to support and encourage these social ventures.

A reporter from the Seattle Times asked how the company makes sure that their day jobs actually gets done.   The culture at Microsoft encourages this level of giving back, but they also see as a good business practice.   Brummel, the SVP from Human Resources, said that it encourages top notch talent to want to work for them. Todd Bishop put like this:  Can Microsoft change the world and conquer it at the same time?

Based on the day of presentations and discussion, it looks like Microsoft’s gives us a stellar example of a CSR program that is at the  intersection of the company’s business and social interests.

Minnesota Open Idea: Crowdsourcing Contest For Social Change Done Right

The Minnesota Open Idea is an example of an online social good contest that works.  It combines expert judging with popular vote, online strategy with good old fashion off line organizing, links objectives to a theory of change, and incorporates a fun and engaging way for people to learn about and take action on a timely community problem.   In this interview,  Jennifer Ford Reedy,  VP for Strategy and Knowledge Management,  at the Minnesota Community Foundation shares the how they designed this online social good contest for success.

Last November, you may have read about how the Minnesota Community Foundation‘s GiveMN’s Minnesota Give to the Max Day raised $14 Million online in 24 hours.   Last week, the community foundation finished its  first Minnesota Open Idea contest  to fund the best idea to address the childhood obesity issue.  The winner was Christine Tubbs, whose idea “Kids Lead the Way” is described in the above video.

They partnered with Ashoka Changemakers to develop a state-of-the art idea challenge web site,  how they married an online social good contest with civic engagement.  They had hundreds of people exercising on the field at a Twins Baseball game and the contest finalists throwing out the first pitch.   The finalists also appeared on the state’s premier public affairs show in an “American Idol” style session to showcase their ideas.

1.)  Why did you pick the childhood obesity issue for the challenge?

Obesity is not our issue as a foundation but our group of operating partners landed on obesity because we thought it was such a good fit with our criteria.  There is a long list but basically: everyone can understand it, everyone could do something about it, it is newsworthy so we can get media partners interested, it is really important for the state.  In the future, challenge topics will be crowd-sourced from the public.

2.) How does your innovation challenge connect with your theory of change?

Our intent is that building this high-tech “civic infrastructure” will improve the functioning of our entire sector.  For MN Idea Open, it is infrastructure to support community problem solving and our hope is that providing an easy to use platform will increase the frequency with which decision makers in Minnesota engage large #s of citizens on issues and, in turn, increase civic engagement and improve the quality of decisions.

Our TOC is (1) that making issue education fun can dramatically increase public engagement on a topic and (2) that framing issues in terms of what people can do about it will make more people internalize that “the problem is us” and encourage them to take action rather than just admiring the problem.

3.) What was your judging process?  You didn’t use the “Vote for Me” approach.

We talked to many others who have sponsored contests in Minnesota and around the country to develop our judging structure.  We wanted expert screening so that we and other partners could feel good that the popularity contest was confined to strong ideas.   We only allowed 1 vote per e-mail address.   We were not trying to create a frenzy around voting for the sake of #s, our goal was  to get as many people as possible to consider the issue and the ideas.

We had 15 community evaluators who reviewed all 400 proposals as they were coming in and scored them on three criteria: Innovation, Impact, and Sustainability. The platform has a judging interface so they could do it all on-line.  Then the group came together and debated the highest-scored proposals and whittled the pool down to 21 ideas. Those 21 ideas were sent to our 7 judges to read, score on each of the same criteria, and rank.  They then came together and debated and picked the three finalists.  The judges represent an amazingly diverse set of perspectives.

The whole process was managed by the Citizens League, which is a local organization that does citizen-driven policy development work.

4.)  Can you share some of the outreach strategies?

We worked with Grassroots Solutions who helped with a grassroots organizing strategy.  They built an inner circle of orgs that we called “the strategy cabinet” to be the heart of the outreach effort.  Strategy cabinet partners got a lot of attention from Grassroots Solutions to help craft strategies to reach all their stakeholders.

They also recruited scores and scores of organizations to be “allies.”  We sent these folks materials to use to engage stakeholders but didn’t give a lot of hand holding.  It was pretty much good, old-fashioned organizing.  GS had interns talking to folks at every single library in the state and following up the conversation with an outreach packet of posters, palm cards, video, etc.  We had tables at nonprofits conferences and at some of the strategy cabinet sites.  We also did all we could through social media and traditional media outreach.  We were able to get substantive interviews with us and issue experts on every major tv and radio station.

5)  If you were do this all over again, anything different?

We WILL do this all over again we’re using what we learn to improve the contest.  Future contests will be easier because we will build on the base of partners/participants we have.  One thing we will definitely do differently is source challenge topics from the public.   We need to have more partners around the state.  I want to have about 100 core organizations that can act as our ambassadors and they start planning their own programming around the Idea Open dates/topics.