Archive for the ‘ROI’ Category

Where Should You Invest Your Time: Google+, Search, or Email?

Source: Pew Internet

Yesterday on Google +,  John Haydon made a provocative  statement:   “It’s a big mistake to say that nonprofits should wait on Google +”

Like my colleague, Geoff Livingston, I disagree with that statement or hoping on bandwagons.   I said as much in a recent Chronicle of Philanthropy Podcast with Alison Fine.

I think nonprofits should wait or rather don’t jump in deeply with a heavy time investment quite yet.  Take an ROI approach to the amount of time that is being spent, especially if you haven’t really built up, engaged, and developed relationships with people via your social networks in other places.

Don’t just do an ROI analysis with your social time.   Your time might be best spent on incorporating  multi-channel best practices.  Do you need to redesign your web site, incorporate SEO, or  beef up your CRM and email strategy.    As John Haydon said later in the thread,  ”Don’t buy the Persian rug if your roof has a hole in it” and then wrote this post.

And if you haven’t yet defined results and  KPIs for your overall online communications or marketing efforts and a measurement strategy start there.   Don’t immediately embrace the shiny new object.

That’s not to say that taking a small amount of time to learn the platform, get the lay of the land, imagine the possibilities without investing a lot of time.  Connect with professional colleagues and talk shop.    I call this the “Andy Warhol” approach – 15 minutes a day.    Then you will be at least be familiar with it when Google + launches Brand presence.

Some advice from Marketing Profs on how to dip your toes in the water efficiently.

It is also useful to do a little audience research or consult secondary studies.    The Pew recently did this study on online habits.  As you can see from the graph above, Pew found:

Email and search form the core of online communication and online information gathering, respectively.   And they have done so for nearly a decade, even as new platforms, broadband and mobile devices continue to reshape the way Americans use the internet and web.  Perhaps the most significant change over that time is that both activities have become more habitual.

 

You can find the complete PEW report here.

Where does your organization to invest is time in its online/multi-channel strategy to be successful?

Social Media and Grantmaking Session at Council on Foundation’s Conference

Council on Foundations ROI Panel

View more presentations from Beth Kanter.

I participated on a panel called Face, Tweet, Link – Socia Media, Grantmaking & A True Social ROI.   Laura Elfurd, Vice President and Chief Community Investment Officer at ZeroDivide moderated a panel that included Stephen Downs, Assistant VP, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; Alexandra Mitchell and Jeff Pryor from Pathfinder Solutions, and Kathy Reich, Program Officer, Organizational Effectiveness & Philanthropy, The David & Lucile Packard Foundation.

I started with an overview of the state of social media measurement and ROI in the nonprofit field, outlining some of the challenges and the needs:

* Social media measurement goes hand in hand with good practice

* Slightly more mature practice for measuring business results vs social impact

* Social media measurement is a discipline, not a task, and it needs to be part of the organization’s culture

* There’s a big need for more training/capacity for measurement discipline and improvement of practice and sharing the stories

Jeff Pryor and Alexandra Mitchell from Pathfinder Solutions shared some specific case studies about how 30 nonprofits in Colorado are measuring the ROI of Social Media, specifically what they are learning from some preliminary research results. This will be very valuable information to the field.

Next, colleague, Kathy Reich, Packard Foundation, talked about their how the foundation has embraced social media as a true experiment. This started in 2008, and as Kathy notes, “We didn’t know what we would learn, or how it would change our own work and our work with grantees. The initial dollar investment was modest, as was staff time. And we are committed to trying many different approaches to help our grantees, and our own staff, understand social media and what it could do for all of us.”

Kathy shared one of those experiments, The Organizational Effective Program wiki.

They started the project using the concept of a “see-through filing cabinet, an experiment in transparency.” They put information about their program, things they have learned and resources they like out on the wiki. The idea was that why keep this goldmine of learning locked up?

Now they are starting to use it to engage with other grantmakers and professionals working on the organizational and network effectiveness. They’ve started their first evaluation of the Organizational Effectiveness grantmaking program in more than a decade. They’ve posted their research questions and research plan on the wiki. As they start to generate findings, they will share what they learn and invite feedback and comments. They are especially interested in knowing what how people interpret and getting actionable suggestions. They’ll keep you posted on how it is going, so stay tuned.

As for ROI—well, they are starting to think more about it, but feel that learning and shared learning is the most valuable return on investment. At the Packard Foundation they are very rigorous about measuring their return on investment on grantmaking strategies. But as Kathy pointed, “The thing is, social media is not a grantmaking strategy. It’s culture change—a new way of working. So when we think about using social media, for individual grants, strategies, or our own work, we try to stay very open to trying new things.”   Their key measures of success with these experiments: 1) Did anything bad happen? 2) Was it worth the time and effort we put into it?

Stephen Downs shared how Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is using social media as part of a larger strategy for becoming a “Web 2.0″ philanthropy. He gave an overview of how the challenges of measuring social impact versus business results and what they have learned so far.

How are you measuring the return on investment of social media for your nonprofit or foundation?

8 Principles of Social Media ROI

I am honored to be a part today’s WomenWhoTech online summit.   I’m doing a panel titled “Social Media ROI” with Lauren Vargas from Radian 6 and moderated by Roz Lemieux from Fission Strategy.   Here’s the description:

Do you know what kind of an impact social media is having on your brand, mission, or bottom line? How do you put a monetary value on branding? This panel will discuss realistic metrics and benchmarks any organization can use in their campaigns and ensure that your using the right strategies and tools to listen and engage your audiences on different social networks.

Notes and Resources


Return on Investment

The Return on Investment financial process was created by DuPont and used by Alfred Sloan to help make General Motors manageable in the 1920s. ROI had it origins as an accounting term and was originally a measure of return on the total investment in the entire business. It is a flow chart that calculates business performance taking into account not only whether the company had a profit, but whether that profit was good enough relative to the assets it took to generate it. Over those 80 years, the chart has been polished, refined and so deeply embedded in business thinking.. Wall Street views it as the only legitimate means of measuring business performance. But ROI was not really intended to measure a technology project, program, or tool or any other isolated aspect of an organization.

Return on Investment is what many executive directors may be thinking when social media strategy comes up. They want to know:

  • How much will it cost?
  • How much time will it take?
  • What are the results?
  • Is it worth it?

And we wonder how do we calculate that? But I urge you not to think of ROI in this limited, narrow way … ROI has a much broader definition than “Show me the money!” At least in the nonprofit sector.

An analysis that looks at the benefits, costs, and value of a technology project over time. It uses metrics to measure your results and help you improve your strategy over time. Helps us move away from tool driven decisions to results.

The Four I’s of ROI

If we look at a broader definition of ROI – I see four different “I” words …

Return on Insight

This is using key metrics to harvest insights about what works and what doesn’t and the process of iteration. David Armano describes this process as “Listen, Learn, and Adapt” In my book, The Networked Nonprofit, we describe this process as “Learning Loops.” This process isn’t always valued, but it the only way to get to more tangible results. It helps you:

Return on Interaction (Engagement and Relationships)

This the process of designing deep engagement and relationship building with your network and measuring it. For example, you are constantly putting conversation starters to your audience – asking their opinion, testing their knowledge, pairing with promotions w/content, and saying thank you. Engaging conversations revolve around getting people to look and discuss your cause or program and getting them to ready to become donors, members, or volunteers. But tactics are only half of the equation, you need to track and measure and there is no better expert to follow and learn from than KD Paine.

Return on Investment (Dollars)

An analysis that looks at the benefits, costs, and value of a social media strategy over time. We are looking at business results or for nonprofits the more tangible financial results that boil down to fundraising, recruiting volunteers, getting names on list, or ways that a social media strategy can save time or be more efficient. The latter, for example, could be reduction of support or administrative costs because your fan base is helping you answer questions or spread the word. Here are a few more.

Return on Impact (Social Change)

Affecting social change is, of course, the ultimate goal for nonprofits. Connecting with people and depending engagement are important building blocks for getting a tangible dollar results — more donors, more volunteers, etc. But this involves looking at the role that social media plays in the total equation of social change — where there is on the ground systemic change.

ROI Analysis Must Begin With SMART Objectives

For measurement to be effective, it has to align directly with the measurable objectives you’ve set. Those measurable objectives should be specific, measurable, actionable, realistic, and timed (following the SMART methodology), and directly correlate to your organization’s big-picture goals for this program (i.e., we want to increase brand awareness).

Having a hypothesis to start from is important. For instance, “We think that an increase in blog subscribers over six months will correlate with an increase in sales,” or, “Post activity on our help forum will decrease call center costs,” are strong hypotheses to get started measuring and benchmarking. Build your goals based on these hypotheses, and measure against them to see if you’re on the right track.

8 Principles of ROI

The rest of the presentation we go through some principles of an ROI process:

Additional Resources

Here’s a list of ROI/Nonprofit/Social Media resources suggested by different people on my Facebook Page.

Oliver Blanchard “Social Media ROI for Associations and Nonprofits

KD Paine’s Twitter Measurement List

Will Hull “Measuring ROI with Outcomes In Mind

SmartBlog “Understanding Social Media ROI in the Nonprofit Space

Additional links are here.


What’s the ROI of Online Voting and Fundraising Contests?

Source:  Extreme Foods

For the third and final Conversational Case Study on America’s Giving Challenge from Allison Fine and I, we  pose a question rather than answer one: Is there a “special sauce” for successful participation in online fundraising contests?   The post summarizes the strategies used by contest winners.

I wonder if the secret sauce is to do a cost/benefit analysis before you start preparing your favorite social media sauce?   Hit the pause button and ask:   “Should our organization participate in the first place?

But how do answer that question?      I got several emails from social media folks at nonprofits today asking that question and wanting a checklist to share with their development officers.   As one person shared in an email, “How do I, as the person responsible for social media, make the case to the fundraising department who is attracted to the potential winning dollars – like moths to  flame?”

Last week’s case study about how the Students for Free Tibet vets participation generated some great responses and advice in the comments from Wendy Harman, Red Cross and Stacey Monk, Epic Change, both veterans of online fundraising and voting contests.

So, I thought I summarize these into a “Cosmos Quiz” format.   There are twenty questions.

If you answer yes to:

15-20 questions:
Participate

10-15  questions:
Use the questions to quantify the cost/benefits and then make the decision

Under 10:
Pass

Contest Sponsor

The first screen should be a cross-check with your organization’s values, mission, and goals and the contest sponsor.   There’s a lot to be said for good contest design from sponsors, but nonprofits should also ask these questions.

  • Are the sponsors and competition model in alignment with our personal values?
  • Are the sponsors and competition model in alignment with our organization values?
  • Do we have a relationship?
  • Do they get social media?
  • Does the contest design align with our mission?

Benefits

Many organizations only look at the dollar amount of the winner’s prize, but it is useful to take a holistic look at the benefits beyond that.   The first question is whether you have a reasonable change of winning.  Here you have to be honest with yourself and analyze the competition.  That means it might not be in your best interest to jump in first.

  • Do we have a reasonable chance of winning?
  • Are there benefits beyond the money?
  • If we don’t win, what can quantify other gains?
  • Can we follow up with new stakeholders that we connect with?
  • Will winning have a positive impact on our mission or ability to deliver programs?
  • Will the contest provide a meaningful opportunity for stakeholder empowerment?
  • Is participation in this contest for our community meaningful, fun or engaging?
  • Will the contest provide any long term benefits?

Costs

You have to think beyond the costs of staff time or related expenses for the contest.  You also need to analyze the social capital cost.

  • Do we want to encourage our community to use the tools required to participate in the competition?
  • Is the contest designed in a way that prevents donor fatigue?
  • Can our closest fans and allies participate on the platform?  Is it inclusive?
  • Do we have the bandwidth to manage our participation in this contest?
  • Does the contest help us build social capital or do we have enough deposited to make a with drawl?
  • Is the contest in line with our organizational priorities demanding our time and resources?
  • Does this competition complement our communications and fundraising activities for the year?
  • Does the contest have potential for abusing our community’s trust or frustrating them with a platform that doesn’t work well?

Let’s continue the conversation over at the Case Foundation Blog and share our recipes for special sauces.