<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/</link>
	<description>How Networked Nonprofits Are Using Social Media to Power Change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Layla</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-12830</link>
		<dc:creator>Layla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 19:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-12830</guid>
		<description>My next year will be greater knowing this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My next year will be greater knowing this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evie</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-12827</link>
		<dc:creator>Evie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 19:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-12827</guid>
		<description>Reader&#039;s New Year might be brighter after reading this post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reader&#8217;s New Year might be brighter after reading this post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Strohl</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-9210</link>
		<dc:creator>John Strohl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 08:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-9210</guid>
		<description>I am, as noted on MY blog, working with a newly launched endeavor called Four Years. Go. that is currently a project of the Pachamama Alliance. We are actively working the challenges of launching a global campaign to change the course of human life on the planet. We find that there is a simultaneous need for both traditional components and structures of leadership and engagement of chaordic thinking or processes. As other have written, chaordic processes engage most naturally at the fringes, which in turn means that you have to pay attention to the fringes much more than you might in a typical, traditional model of management. In any event, we are working this through and by dint of shear perseverance it is happening. Another interesting point though, is that the fringe is not always where you expect it. Sometime the fringe can be in the living room of a founding member of the Pachamama Alliance sometimes it&#039;s in a volunteer&#039;s cell phone in Connecticut, so &quot;the fringe&quot; is more a matter of where the experimental thinking is taking place, or experiments are occurring rather than just out in the hinterlands with the folks farthest down the food chain. True, they will experiment readily because they have little to lose and much to gain, as well as being resource poor many time, but the fringe is wherever that thinking is happening. Our latest adventure is that we&#039;re bring Jonathan Budd (current success story in direct internet marketing) into the picture by his own request and we&#039;re going to jump into his world with both feet to develop a micro-philanthropy engine based on his revenue engine. Anyway, we&#039;re doing it as well as I know anyone doing it, and it&#039;s a genuine adventure that I wouldn&#039;t miss for the world. Actually, that&#039;s why I&#039;m in it - for the world. Come see us @ http://www.fouryearsgo.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am, as noted on MY blog, working with a newly launched endeavor called Four Years. Go. that is currently a project of the Pachamama Alliance. We are actively working the challenges of launching a global campaign to change the course of human life on the planet. We find that there is a simultaneous need for both traditional components and structures of leadership and engagement of chaordic thinking or processes. As other have written, chaordic processes engage most naturally at the fringes, which in turn means that you have to pay attention to the fringes much more than you might in a typical, traditional model of management. In any event, we are working this through and by dint of shear perseverance it is happening. Another interesting point though, is that the fringe is not always where you expect it. Sometime the fringe can be in the living room of a founding member of the Pachamama Alliance sometimes it&#8217;s in a volunteer&#8217;s cell phone in Connecticut, so &#8220;the fringe&#8221; is more a matter of where the experimental thinking is taking place, or experiments are occurring rather than just out in the hinterlands with the folks farthest down the food chain. True, they will experiment readily because they have little to lose and much to gain, as well as being resource poor many time, but the fringe is wherever that thinking is happening. Our latest adventure is that we&#8217;re bring Jonathan Budd (current success story in direct internet marketing) into the picture by his own request and we&#8217;re going to jump into his world with both feet to develop a micro-philanthropy engine based on his revenue engine. Anyway, we&#8217;re doing it as well as I know anyone doing it, and it&#8217;s a genuine adventure that I wouldn&#8217;t miss for the world. Actually, that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m in it &#8211; for the world. Come see us @ <a href="http://www.fouryearsgo.org/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fouryearsgo.org/?referer=');">http://www.fouryearsgo.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam @ Portable Workbench Site</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-8969</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam @ Portable Workbench Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 19:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-8969</guid>
		<description>I am going to design and build my own extension next spring, so will come to sites like this to get information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to design and build my own extension next spring, so will come to sites like this to get information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa Hartman</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-742</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa Hartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-742</guid>
		<description>This year I have had the good fortune of joining the inaugural consortium of LEAD, a certificated nonprofit management program created and facilitated by the Community Foundation for Monterey County and funded by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation.

One of my projects was to create for our organization a strategic communications&#039; plan. It has been a rewarding challenge, and one part I have enjoyed very much has been adding strategic social media messaging to our communications. Working with Beth has been a blessing.

This plan has allowed our management team to meet regularly and to plan and executive external and internal communications much more efficiently. 

I believe we are on the right track as we cope with an ever-rising service population--serving now 1/5 of Monterey County--nearly 100,000 people with a staff of 16 and a volunteer network of many hundreds. Getting the word out in any way we can to people who need food and to our supporters is essential, and now we have a proactive approach to it all. Tweaking will be ongoing, of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year I have had the good fortune of joining the inaugural consortium of LEAD, a certificated nonprofit management program created and facilitated by the Community Foundation for Monterey County and funded by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation.</p>
<p>One of my projects was to create for our organization a strategic communications&#8217; plan. It has been a rewarding challenge, and one part I have enjoyed very much has been adding strategic social media messaging to our communications. Working with Beth has been a blessing.</p>
<p>This plan has allowed our management team to meet regularly and to plan and executive external and internal communications much more efficiently. </p>
<p>I believe we are on the right track as we cope with an ever-rising service population&#8211;serving now 1/5 of Monterey County&#8211;nearly 100,000 people with a staff of 16 and a volunteer network of many hundreds. Getting the word out in any way we can to people who need food and to our supporters is essential, and now we have a proactive approach to it all. Tweaking will be ongoing, of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-660</guid>
		<description>One of the challenges in our organization is collaborating across departments and knowing what&#039;s happening within different parts of the organizations.  For years, we&#039;ve discussed creating an intranet to increase communication flow and discussion across departments.  We rely heavily on email, which is not a great tool for networking or tracking conversations among different groups.  I recently stumbled upon Yammer.com - an internal social networking site for organizations.  Does anyone else have experience using Yammer?  I&#039;m intrigued by the concept and I wonder if people find it useful as a networking tool within their organizations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the challenges in our organization is collaborating across departments and knowing what&#8217;s happening within different parts of the organizations.  For years, we&#8217;ve discussed creating an intranet to increase communication flow and discussion across departments.  We rely heavily on email, which is not a great tool for networking or tracking conversations among different groups.  I recently stumbled upon Yammer.com &#8211; an internal social networking site for organizations.  Does anyone else have experience using Yammer?  I&#8217;m intrigued by the concept and I wonder if people find it useful as a networking tool within their organizations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Our small community foundation is just starting to scratch the surface of on line connectivity and conversation.  And I am a brand new board member.  We are not large enough to have &quot;communications staff&quot; - we struggle to pay a very part time ED. I am learning so much from the dialogue here on Beth&#039;s blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our small community foundation is just starting to scratch the surface of on line connectivity and conversation.  And I am a brand new board member.  We are not large enough to have &#8220;communications staff&#8221; &#8211; we struggle to pay a very part time ED. I am learning so much from the dialogue here on Beth&#8217;s blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather J. @ TLC Book Tours</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather J. @ TLC Book Tours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 03:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-582</guid>
		<description>How exciting to see an organization that you are so closely associated with used in the book! I&#039;m so glad that you enjoyed this one - thanks for being a part of the tour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exciting to see an organization that you are so closely associated with used in the book! I&#8217;m so glad that you enjoyed this one &#8211; thanks for being a part of the tour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Achen</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Achen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 15:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-569</guid>
		<description>In my experience, it&#039;s been easy to get tripped up on “presentation” when making any effort public. Like many nonprofits, I suspect, we are constantly tempted to look out for our &quot;brand,&quot; our reputation, and attempt to manage how any communication effort is perceived, consumed and of course measured for it&#039;s success. Our print newsletter, for example is a three month process from start to finish. It&#039;s reviewed, re-reviewed, tweaked, meticulously designed, and checked for any nuance of context that might misrepresent or compromise an important relationship, either internally or externally. 

Granted this is the most extreme example and many of our other communication efforts are more streamlined and timely, especially our social media efforts. Upon reflection, each has its place in our overall marketing and communication strategy. Nevertheless, nonprofit communication must be thought of much less “promotionally” and be approached much more relationally.

We need to change the question.

Instead of asking “how will we be percieved?” we need to ask ourselves “how does this connect us to the people we care about?” If it were to take three months to draft and vet a Facebook post, we’d have missed the opportunity to connect because we were stuck in meetings haggling over a dangling participle.

If we are asking how does this connect us with the people we care about, we’d be much more deliberate about the balance between the “relational” and “promotional.” To connect with people requires timeliness and a personal touch. At the same time, it requires the attention to detail that shows we care about our message, our cause and ultimately about those we serve. (Sloppy messaging, no matter how timely or personal, is not good.)

Social media not only accelerates the communication effort, but allows for the transparency, trust and reciprocity that you and Allison talk about in The Networked Nonprofit. The scary thing about trial and error for any organization is the fear of wasting time and possibly displaying our failures publicly. No professional communicator wants to publish their “work in progress.” But, a relational culture of communicating should teach us to do our work out in the open, allowing people see the steps in our process, even collaborating with us and helping us improve, respond and adapt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, it&#8217;s been easy to get tripped up on “presentation” when making any effort public. Like many nonprofits, I suspect, we are constantly tempted to look out for our &#8220;brand,&#8221; our reputation, and attempt to manage how any communication effort is perceived, consumed and of course measured for it&#8217;s success. Our print newsletter, for example is a three month process from start to finish. It&#8217;s reviewed, re-reviewed, tweaked, meticulously designed, and checked for any nuance of context that might misrepresent or compromise an important relationship, either internally or externally. </p>
<p>Granted this is the most extreme example and many of our other communication efforts are more streamlined and timely, especially our social media efforts. Upon reflection, each has its place in our overall marketing and communication strategy. Nevertheless, nonprofit communication must be thought of much less “promotionally” and be approached much more relationally.</p>
<p>We need to change the question.</p>
<p>Instead of asking “how will we be percieved?” we need to ask ourselves “how does this connect us to the people we care about?” If it were to take three months to draft and vet a Facebook post, we’d have missed the opportunity to connect because we were stuck in meetings haggling over a dangling participle.</p>
<p>If we are asking how does this connect us with the people we care about, we’d be much more deliberate about the balance between the “relational” and “promotional.” To connect with people requires timeliness and a personal touch. At the same time, it requires the attention to detail that shows we care about our message, our cause and ultimately about those we serve. (Sloppy messaging, no matter how timely or personal, is not good.)</p>
<p>Social media not only accelerates the communication effort, but allows for the transparency, trust and reciprocity that you and Allison talk about in The Networked Nonprofit. The scary thing about trial and error for any organization is the fear of wasting time and possibly displaying our failures publicly. No professional communicator wants to publish their “work in progress.” But, a relational culture of communicating should teach us to do our work out in the open, allowing people see the steps in our process, even collaborating with us and helping us improve, respond and adapt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 20:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-552</guid>
		<description>I loved the Ted Talk that Shirky gave on the idea of having a cognitive surplus.  I watched it a few weeks ago.  

I am lucky as an AmeriCorps VISTA to serve a Volunteer, Service-Learning and AmeriCorps program office in a small town in Idaho.  As their Social Media Developer, I have tried to expand this office&#039;s reach through social media and increase the quality of our web presence using mostly Web 2.0 technology.

I think it&#039;s important that you get everyone in the office using social media, keeping everyone up to date about changes in how it is used for non-profits, and I have recently found that Nutshellmail is popular for those who are interested in social media but have limited time and would rather peruse an email to stay up to date.

The next step for me is to get us on the track of using e-volunteering and taking advantage of the cloud, with crowdsourcing.  By working collaboratively online with co-workers and people around the world who share our goals.  One example is using Vark.com to ask questions that help us make decisions in the office.  For example, we recently asked what was out there to build online learning modules for service-learning, and we got a bunch of great responses, saving us days or weeks of research.  It&#039;s only when you&#039;ve plugged into the largest group possible that you can really adapt and be flexible. 

Thanks for posting this...I love the idea of cognitive surplus.  I may just dedicate my career to it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the Ted Talk that Shirky gave on the idea of having a cognitive surplus.  I watched it a few weeks ago.  </p>
<p>I am lucky as an AmeriCorps VISTA to serve a Volunteer, Service-Learning and AmeriCorps program office in a small town in Idaho.  As their Social Media Developer, I have tried to expand this office&#8217;s reach through social media and increase the quality of our web presence using mostly Web 2.0 technology.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s important that you get everyone in the office using social media, keeping everyone up to date about changes in how it is used for non-profits, and I have recently found that Nutshellmail is popular for those who are interested in social media but have limited time and would rather peruse an email to stay up to date.</p>
<p>The next step for me is to get us on the track of using e-volunteering and taking advantage of the cloud, with crowdsourcing.  By working collaboratively online with co-workers and people around the world who share our goals.  One example is using Vark.com to ask questions that help us make decisions in the office.  For example, we recently asked what was out there to build online learning modules for service-learning, and we got a bunch of great responses, saving us days or weeks of research.  It&#8217;s only when you&#8217;ve plugged into the largest group possible that you can really adapt and be flexible. </p>
<p>Thanks for posting this&#8230;I love the idea of cognitive surplus.  I may just dedicate my career to it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Joy</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-550</guid>
		<description>I think you are exactly right, Charlotte.  You made and excellent point. I think it takes dedicated leaders to nudge the incorporation of new social networking tools along; to introduce them with confidence and make them as easy to learn as possible.  The unknown is scary for a lot of people. I admit that I too can be a little timid when it comes to technical and online/networking tools and I am &quot;in the social networking generation&quot;. It all can seem very intimidating and overwhelming, especially to nonprofits with an already overworked staff.

I think encouraging a shared mindset among the board and staff that learning from unsuccessful or ineffective ideas and tools is valuable, that trying new things can be positive and actually improve what the organization already does well, and that...{gasp} failure is not the worst thing that could happen, is definitely a start to breaking down the adaptation barrier. Easier said than done, I know. Believe me, I know. Our board president was reluctant to create a website! Shocking, but true.

Please feel free to disagree, but adapting and learning rapidly seems to me to be a function of an organization where the staff and board members each individually believe what Clay talks about,  “It is more important to try something new, and work on the problems as they arise, than to figure out a way to do something new without having any problems.”  

Again, easier said than done and I am interested to see some feedback on the second part of Beth&#039;s question, for those organizations that do adapt and learn rapidly, how exactly did you get to that point?

Thanks so much for this post Beth! I look forward to reading The Networked Nonprofit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are exactly right, Charlotte.  You made and excellent point. I think it takes dedicated leaders to nudge the incorporation of new social networking tools along; to introduce them with confidence and make them as easy to learn as possible.  The unknown is scary for a lot of people. I admit that I too can be a little timid when it comes to technical and online/networking tools and I am &#8220;in the social networking generation&#8221;. It all can seem very intimidating and overwhelming, especially to nonprofits with an already overworked staff.</p>
<p>I think encouraging a shared mindset among the board and staff that learning from unsuccessful or ineffective ideas and tools is valuable, that trying new things can be positive and actually improve what the organization already does well, and that&#8230;{gasp} failure is not the worst thing that could happen, is definitely a start to breaking down the adaptation barrier. Easier said than done, I know. Believe me, I know. Our board president was reluctant to create a website! Shocking, but true.</p>
<p>Please feel free to disagree, but adapting and learning rapidly seems to me to be a function of an organization where the staff and board members each individually believe what Clay talks about,  “It is more important to try something new, and work on the problems as they arise, than to figure out a way to do something new without having any problems.”  </p>
<p>Again, easier said than done and I am interested to see some feedback on the second part of Beth&#8217;s question, for those organizations that do adapt and learn rapidly, how exactly did you get to that point?</p>
<p>Thanks so much for this post Beth! I look forward to reading The Networked Nonprofit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlotte burch</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>charlotte burch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Beth - I especially appreciated your personal response. That&#039;s the tremendous power inherent in social media - connecting with people that one would otherwise not be able to. And, building *unexpected collaborations*(borrowed from Second Life 7th birthday celebration!) that strengthen the reach of nonprofits, especially small, local ones that are, as you say, &quot;...making the shift from scarcity to abundance.&quot;  

And, while reluctant to add my birthdate in order to validate my perspective, being wired has more to do with curiosity about the world we live in than age!  

And with gentle nudges thanks to books like yours with amazing examples, all generations can find ways to participate in Networked Nonprofits!  

Trust me on this one :) and check the number of grandparents who take on the challenge of Facebook to stay in touch with their grandkids!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Beth &#8211; I especially appreciated your personal response. That&#8217;s the tremendous power inherent in social media &#8211; connecting with people that one would otherwise not be able to. And, building *unexpected collaborations*(borrowed from Second Life 7th birthday celebration!) that strengthen the reach of nonprofits, especially small, local ones that are, as you say, &#8220;&#8230;making the shift from scarcity to abundance.&#8221;  </p>
<p>And, while reluctant to add my birthdate in order to validate my perspective, being wired has more to do with curiosity about the world we live in than age!  </p>
<p>And with gentle nudges thanks to books like yours with amazing examples, all generations can find ways to participate in Networked Nonprofits!  </p>
<p>Trust me on this one <img src='http://www.bethkanter.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  and check the number of grandparents who take on the challenge of Facebook to stay in touch with their grandkids!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Tso</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Tso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Our community is 60 percent Asian, mostly well-educated immigrants from Taiwan. I would love to figure out a way to engage folks around school issues in both Chinese and English that opens up dialogue between them and uses technology as the opening to a safe space to do that. We have a local education foundation that is interested in convening the community in a constuctive way, and maybe technology has some tools that could be useful. As a foundation, we could learn a lot from that process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our community is 60 percent Asian, mostly well-educated immigrants from Taiwan. I would love to figure out a way to engage folks around school issues in both Chinese and English that opens up dialogue between them and uses technology as the opening to a safe space to do that. We have a local education foundation that is interested in convening the community in a constuctive way, and maybe technology has some tools that could be useful. As a foundation, we could learn a lot from that process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbie Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-543</guid>
		<description>My organization is still feeling its way with social media. Our constituency is mostly older, not very wired, people but we know we need to cultivate the younger generation. Our management team is leery. Our communications staff is overworked. (What else is new?) Meanwhile, I’m reading everything I can get my hands on, so please put me in the running for your review copy of Clay Shirkey’s new book (I loved “Here Comes Everybody”).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My organization is still feeling its way with social media. Our constituency is mostly older, not very wired, people but we know we need to cultivate the younger generation. Our management team is leery. Our communications staff is overworked. (What else is new?) Meanwhile, I’m reading everything I can get my hands on, so please put me in the running for your review copy of Clay Shirkey’s new book (I loved “Here Comes Everybody”).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Charlotte:   As we say in the book, it takes time and requires patience.  It isn&#039;t an easy shift.   I think for smaller organization it is making the shift from scarcity to abundance.  Thanks for stopping to commment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlotte:   As we say in the book, it takes time and requires patience.  It isn&#8217;t an easy shift.   I think for smaller organization it is making the shift from scarcity to abundance.  Thanks for stopping to commment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlotte burch</title>
		<link>http://www.bethkanter.org/cognitive-surplus/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>charlotte burch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bethkanter.org/?p=565#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Your question is the same question I had that led me to purchase your own book to find the answers!

I bought it with the hope that I can find a way to lead my very small nonprofit to a comfort zone that will allow them to see the value that using social media wisely can bring to our group and the causes we support. 

So, rapidly adapting does not ring true for this group quite yet, but I think that Shirky&#039;s idea that trying something new with the assumption that any problems that arise can be solved along the way is good for a small, young and not quite ready to be networked nonprofit like the one I work with. 

As I have been reading your book and the excellent examples you and Allison cite, I&#039;m closer to answering my original question - now to find ways to bring my group along!  

Enjoyed this post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your question is the same question I had that led me to purchase your own book to find the answers!</p>
<p>I bought it with the hope that I can find a way to lead my very small nonprofit to a comfort zone that will allow them to see the value that using social media wisely can bring to our group and the causes we support. </p>
<p>So, rapidly adapting does not ring true for this group quite yet, but I think that Shirky&#8217;s idea that trying something new with the assumption that any problems that arise can be solved along the way is good for a small, young and not quite ready to be networked nonprofit like the one I work with. </p>
<p>As I have been reading your book and the excellent examples you and Allison cite, I&#8217;m closer to answering my original question &#8211; now to find ways to bring my group along!  </p>
<p>Enjoyed this post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

