The Perils of Fake News, Coordinated Misinformation, and Social Media Addiction | Beth's Blog

The Perils of Fake News, Coordinated Misinformation, and Social Media Addiction

Philanthropy

There have been many news articles recently about social media for evil: How Facebook, Twitter, Google, and even Instagram have been abused for coordinated misinformation paid social media or advertising to influence our political system. Find out what funders are doing to fight it in this upcoming Media Impact Funders webinar series.

It makes me miss the optimism from a decade ago about the rise of social media and social network platforms.  We had great hopes (and still do) about the potential for “social media for social good,” how networks, connected society, and movements can be catalyzed to solve complex social change problems, for good causes and for philanthropy.   But as one of the engineers who helped create the Facebook like button noted in this in recent Guardian article, humans develop things with the best of intentions and for them to have unintended, negative consequences.”

The article describes the great lengths that Silicon Valley insiders are going to disconnect from social media and their mobile phones. These insiders are the same engineers who designed and built different features in social media platforms that created our behavior addictions.  Makes you wonder what they know that the average user does not?

Dubbed “Brain Hacking,” this 60 Minutes  piece aired last April,sheds light on the problem from researchers.  They also interviewed a former Google product manager turned interface design ethicist, Tristan Harris, about how tech companies are intentionally creating a large scale epidemic of people getting hooked to their smartphones. (It enables the platforms to make money from advertisers who want to get that captured audiences’ attention.)

While at Google, Harris produced an extensive presentation titled “A Call to Minimize Distraction & Respect Users’ Attention.”  The presentation inspired with Ted Talk and then a popular Medium post that discusses how interface design influences people’s behaviors.

It makes it very difficult to “quit” platforms like Facebook and others, despite many people saying they would like to stop. Recently, Micah Sifry wrote this post called, I Wish I Knew How to Quit You Facebook that prompted an interesting discussion thread (ironically playing out on Facebook) with other nonprofit folks.

The lack of ethics of social media platforms is bigger than the problem of individuals ruining their ability to focus and unable to separate from their smartphones. Now that social media platforms are essentially pay to play or have been transformed in what is being called the “Advertising Economy,” our human attention is being sold to the highest bidder, whether it is to sell us products like flavored water or to influence our political views and ultimately chip away at civil society.

The Guardian article connects the dots between the rise of social media behavior addiction and the selling our attention to the potentially devastating impact upon our human relationships and  society. You might argue that it is an overly dystopian view. Or after reading the article you might feel utterly depressed and want curl up in the fetal position.

What can we do?

On an individual level, we can focus on the consumption area. We can become more intentional about not being so hooked to our social media and mobile apps and more critical consumers of information, especially before we share it. Although that is not enough.

Five years ago, Howard Rheingold wrote a book called Netsmart, that presaged the attention economy. He provides techniques to help you answer a simple question, “Does this deserve my attention?”

On a system, big picture level, check out Media Impact Funders webinar series to explore what funders can do to fight misinformation and fake news and the negative impact. Broadly speaking, the philanthropic initiatives mentioned in the post and that will be explored in the webinars seek to intervene at one of three points in the information system: on the production of politically relevant information, on its distribution, or on its consumption. A solution needs to address all three areas.

How has age of coordinated misinformation impacted your nonprofit’s ability to have impact?  How is brain hacking of social platforms impacted you personally or other nonprofit professionals?

11 Responses

  1. “How has age of coordinated misinformation impacted your nonprofit’s ability to have impact?” Where to begin? The UN’s work is regularly undermined by coordinated misinformation – about vaccines, about the response to Zika, about election support, and on and on. Planned Parenthood, teacher’s unions, census takers, the American Dental Association… all are hit regularly by coordinated misinformation campaigns, many of them pre dating the Internet. I first started tracking this in 2005, and posting about it on my web site as of 2006. Social media has taken what was already a problem and blown it up even bigger. Even our little farmer’s market here in the small town where I live is affected: social media helped perpetuate a rumor that ICE was patrolling the market, arresting people without papers (that wasn’t happening – it *was* happening outside of the county courthouse, however). I regularly tell nonprofits: if you aren’t doing media monitoring, if you aren’t regularly asking volunteers and clients what they are hearing about your work online, if you don’t have a couple of online volunteers monitoring Reddit and Topix about your nonprofit or public school, you are at risk for a horrific misinformation campaign that can take months, even years, to recover from.

  2. […] “How has age of coordinated misinformation impacted your … by Jayne Cravens […]

  3. […] from the platform. Beth Kanter, who first alerted me to Sifry’s piece, wrote her own very useful round-up of recent arguments about why and how it’s so hard to leave […]

  4. […] In a post for Civic Hall, Micah Sifry recently declared, “I Wish I Knew How to Quit You, Facebook.”  After writing a terrific take-down of Facebook in Wired, Virginia Heffernan announced her own departure from the platform. Beth Kanter, who first alerted me to Sifry’s piece, wrote her own very useful… […]

  5. Nadine says:

    The problem is even worse than you describe for reasons even beyond fake news and privacy and selling data. Basically FB is a useless tool that even information professionals like librarians have flocked to because of critical mass. But while it caters to our short term, immediate gratification needs it is terrible as a curation tool, unlike the relics of the past, the various internet groups which are still publicly searchable but went defunct around the rise of FB.
    So now you have the “magazine cycle” in FB. Someone asks a question, gets 500 likes, 54 responses (the last 42 invariably just repeat what the first 12 said) and then gets buried. And then in a few days / months / quarters the same question comes up again. We don’t build knowledge. We don’t even build information.

  6. Suraj says:

    social media is increasing and it is becoming a problem now a days, a major reason for that is fake news spread through the platforms.

Leave a Reply